The Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) went into effect for tax year 2015. If you haven’t already started doing so, we wanted to provide you with some guidance on what information an applicable large employer should be tracking monthly and reporting annually to help you meet reporting requirements for 2015.

Overview of the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions

ACAEmployerMonthlyTracking_Page_1Before going into too much new detail, it’s important to briefly review the employer mandate. Applicable large employers are required to comply with the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions beginning in January 2015. For 2015, a company must employ 100 full-time and full-time equivalent employees to be considered an applicable large employer. That amount reduces for 2016 down to 50 full-time and full-time equivalent employees. Companies meeting these thresholds are required to offer minimum essential health coverage to at least 70% of full-time employees and their dependents to be compliant. In 2016 and thereafter, the percentage increases to 95% of full-time employees and their dependents.

 

For a more in-depth discussion of the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions and a brief discussion of how to calculate full-time and full-time equivalent employees, please see our article published December 13, 2014, "Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions of the ACA are in Effect for 2015."

 

Information to Track Monthly

During 2015, applicable large employers need to track whether they offered full-time employees and their dependents minimum essential coverage that meets the minimum value requirements and is affordable. They also need to track whether their employees enroll in the minimum essential coverage that was offered by the employer. It is important to track this information because an employer could be subject to an employer shared responsibility payment if either:

 

New Reporting Requirements

ACAEmployerMonthlyTracking_Page_2The ACA requires that applicable large employers file information returns with the IRS as well as provide statements on healthcare coverage to full-time employees. Reporting this information was voluntary for 2014, but in 2015, all applicable large employers are required to file the reporting forms. It is important to note that the reporting requirements apply to ALL applicable large employers starting in 2015. This means that if your business has 50-99 full-time employees in 2015, and therefore qualifies for transition relief from the employer mandate because you have less than 100 full-time employees, you will still be required to file the forms for 2015.

 

Form 1095-C: “Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage”

Applicable large employers must provide Form1095-C to full-time employees. In addition, a copy of the form is filed with the IRS as an information return. This form is used by the IRS to help determine whether full-time employees are eligible for the premium tax credit, and it also helps determine if a business may potentially owe an employer shared responsibility payment. The following information is required to complete Form 1095-C:

 

Form 1094-C: “Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns”

Form 1094-C is filed as a transmittal document for Forms 1095-C, serving as a summary of the totals from Form 1095-C much as a Form W-3 serves  as a summary of the totals from Form W-2. This form is used by the IRS to help determine whether an employer is subject to a shared responsibility payment and the payment amount.

 

Conclusion

The Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions of the ACA contain many new requirements for filing. In order to be compliant with the reporting requirements, an employer must first determine whether it will be considered an applicable large employer subject to the ACA mandate. If determined to be an applicable large employer, the next step will be to track information monthly on the health coverage offered and the employees participating in the health plan. This information is critical for applicable large employers to be able to provide the required information to their employees and the IRS.


For more information…

 

See our website for helpful charts, previously published articles, and the required IRS filing forms.

On February 18, 2015, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2015-17, which reiterates the conclusion in previous guidance addressing employer payment plans – that they are not in compliance with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This article will discuss the additional guidance provided by Notice 2015-17, and it will also serve as an update to the article that Stockman Kast Ryan & Co. published on December 15, 2014 linked here:

https://www.skrco.com/what-the-affordable-care-act-means-for-reimbursement-type-plans/

HEALTH_INSURANCE-180Transition Relief for Small Employer Reimbursement Plans

Notice 2015-17 states that employer payment plans, (plans that pay directly for or reimburse employees in part or full for health insurance) are considered group health plans that are not in compliance with the Affordable Care Act. However, the Notice does provide transition relief to small employers – those who are not Applicable Large Employers, meaning that they have less than 50 full-time or full-time equivalent employees. Small employers have until June 30, 2015 to transition their plan to one in compliance with the Affordable Care Act or be subject to excise tax under Internal Revenue Code §4980D. The excise tax is equal to $100 per day, per employee, or $36,500 per participant, per year.  

The transition relief applies to:

1.Employer payment plans, as described in Notice 2013-54 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-13-54.pdf);

2.S Corporation healthcare arrangements for 2-percent shareholder-employees;

3.Medicare premium reimbursement arrangements;

4.TRICARE-related health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).

S Corporation Guidance for 2% Shareholder-employees

Notice 2015-17 provides that the IRS is still contemplating publication of additional guidance on the application of market reforms to a 2-percent shareholder-employee healthcare arrangement. The good news for taxpayers is that until this guidance is issued, and in any event through the end of 2015, these arrangements will not be subject to the excise tax under Internal Revenue Code §4980D. In addition, S corporations with a 2-percent shareholder-employee healthcare arrangement will not be required to file Form 8928. Keep in mind that this relief does not apply to S corporation employees who are not 2-percent shareholders.

As discussed in the December article, the market reforms do not apply to a group health plan with less than two participants. For this reason, a plan covering only a single S corporation employee is not subject to the market reforms or the excise tax.

Medicare Reimbursements

Arrangements that reimburse employees for Medicare Part B or Part D premiums are considered employer payment plans under IRS Notice 2013-54. Notice 2015-17 discusses that when an employer reimburses the cost of Medicare premiums and integrates this with another group health plan offered by the employer, then this is permissible under the market reforms.

 However, this is permissible only if:

1.The employer offers a group health plan (other than the Medicare reimbursement arrangement) to the employee that does not consist solely of excepted benefits and offers coverage providing minimum value;

2.The employee participating in the Medicare reimbursement arrangement is actually enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B;

3.The Medicare reimbursement arrangement is available only to employees who are enrolled in Medicare Part A and Part B or Part D;

4.The Medicare reimbursement arrangement is limited to reimbursement of Medicare Part B or Part D premiums and excepted benefits, including Medicare premiums.

Employee Reimbursement

Notice 2015-17 confirms the argument that an employer may increase an employee’s taxable compensation, not conditioned on the purchase of health insurance, without creating an employer payment plan.  Because this type of arrangement will not be considered a group health plan, it is not subject to the market reform provisions.

Unfortunately, the IRS has clarified that after-tax employer payment plans are, in fact, subject to excise tax under Code §4980D. An arrangement where an employer pays for or reimburses an employee for the cost of health insurance is subject to the market reform provisions of the Affordable Care Act without regard to whether the employer treats the money as pre-tax or post-tax to the employee.

Conclusions

The market reform provisions of the Affordable Care Act are continuously updating and taking shape as more guidance is received on the application of these rules from the IRS. Notice 2015-17 contains some important clarification on the employer reimbursement arrangements as well as transition relief through June 30, 2015 for some small employer plans. We will continue to update you as new information and guidance becomes available.

 

Manage and Improve Cash Flow in Your Professional Practice

Cash Squeeze

 
Cash flow is the life blood of professional practices. There are many challenges particularly faced by both medical and dental practices that could have significant impact on practice cash flow including:
 
Today’s medical and dental practices, in varying degrees, are built on credit. Physicians and dentists provide services now with the expectation of getting paid later. As a result, in order to keep the cash flow healthy and meet the obligations of the practice, accounts receivable must consistently be collected quickly and accurately.  
 

Recommendations to maintain healthy cash flow:

 
  1. Train your staff. Train your staff to be confident and proficient in the accounts receivable collection process. Explain to them how the billing and collection process affects the bottom line of the practice and the practice’s ability to give pay raises and bonuses. Give them the tools they need, including up to date computer equipment, to do their job well.
  2. Verify eligibility early and often. Collect insurance information and verify and update patient information at each patient visit. If the patient’s insurance and other information is not correct in your records, at best, payment will be delayed and at worst, payment will be denied. Because of the grace period included in the Affordable Care Act, it’s important to check eligibility at the time the patient’s appointment is made and again one to three days before the appointment.  
  3. Collect co-pays, deductibles and prior balances due at the time of service. Due to rising costs, employers have increased deductibles and co-pays for employee medical and dental insurance plans. As a result, a critical step in maintaining/improving cash flow is to collect co-pays, deductibles and prior balances at the time of service. Let your patients know at the time they make an appointment that deductibles, co-pays and prior balances must be paid at the time of service. Verify insurance coverage prior to the appointment to allow the practice to accurately communicate the practice’s expectations to the patient for payment prior to the appointment.
  4. Monitor rejected claims from the clearinghouse. This allows the practice to correct claims before it reaches the third party payer, allowing for quicker payment of the claim.
  5. Reduce claim denial rates by managing denials. Monitor denials to determine trends so that methods of reducing denials can be developed by the practice.
  6. Strengthen internal controls. Check our earlier post “6 Internal Controls Your Medical Practice Needs Right Now” to prevent cash leakage and fraud.
  7. Speed up the deposit of cash to your bank. Utilize remote deposit services which enable a practice to deposit checks into a bank account from its office by scanning a digital image of a check into a computer and the transmitting the image to the bank.
  8. Benchmark your practice’s accounts receivable billing and collection process. Compare your aging schedule, net collection percentage and days sales in accounts receivable with those or your peers by using surveys from MGMA, the AMA or other organizations.
  9. Review practice expenses. Benchmark your largest expenses for staff and office space with those of your peers. Look for other expenses that would be easy to reduce. Remember that a dollar saved in expense will result in a dollar increase in the bottom line and cash flow. Conversely, a dollar of additional revenue will not result in a dollar increase in the bottom line and cash flow because of variable costs associated with the production of the income.
  10. Plan for cash flow disruptions. Every practice experiences a disruption in cash flow from time to time. A doctor goes on maternity leave or takes a leave of absence, for example. Or perhaps you know from experience that next year’s conversion to ICD-10 will entail additional administrative time and payment delays. Cash flow modeling can indicate when and to what degree you can expect a cash flow crunch. This advance warning enables you to take proactive steps to smooth out rough patches in cash flow, such as taking out a short-term line of credit.
Are you looking for ways to improve the cash flow of your practice? Contact Stockman Kast Ryan & CO, LLP to discuss how cash flow modeling can help you project your practice’s ability to meet its upcoming obligations and develop a plan to fill any short-term gaps.

Lemonade StandFor taxpayers there is an important distinction between what the IRS considers a hobby and what is considered a business. Internal Revenue Code Section 162 allows the deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses if they result from a trade or business. On the other end of the spectrum, Code Section 183 limits the deductions for taxpayers related to activities not engaged in for profit. The expenses may only be deducted to the extent of gross income from the Section 183 activity.

Determination of Business or Hobby

Generally a business is entered into for profit. In order to be characterized as a business, there must be intent to make a profit. A hobby may be entered into for recreation, not to make a profit. The IRS has provided nine factors to help determine if a business is operated for a profit:

In addition to the nine factors listed above, the IRS presumes that an activity is carried on for profit if it makes a profit during at least three of the last five years, including the current year. (An exception would be for activities that consist primarily of breeding, showing, training or racing horses, the IRS looks for a profit in at least two of the last seven years.)

The taxpayer has the burden of proof related to proving the required profit motive. A court will weigh all the facts and circumstances, with greater weight given to objective facts than to the taxpayer’s mere statement of intent.

Limits on Deductions for a Hobby

Deductions from hobby activities are limited to the gross income from that activity. If an overall loss occurs for a hobby activity during a tax year, this loss cannot be used to offset other types of income.

The deductions for hobby activities must be claimed as itemized deductions on Schedule A of Form 1040. Therefore, a taxpayer must itemize deductions to deduct any expenses related to the hobby activities. They must be taken in the following order and only to the extent stated:

1.  Deductions that a taxpayer may take for personal as well as business activities, such as home mortgage interest and taxes. These may be taken in full. They should be listed on the correct lines on Schedule A.

2.  Deductions that do not result in an adjustment to basis, such as advertising, insurance and wages. These may be deducted to the extent gross income for the activity is more than the deductions from the first category.

3.  Deductions that reduce the basis of property, such a depreciation and amortization. These are taken last and only to the extent that gross income for the activity is more than the deductions taken in the first two categories.

Deductions in the second and third category must be claimed as miscellaneous deductions on Schedule A. That makes them subject to the 2% of adjusted gross income (“AGI”) limit. What this means is that in addition to the limits already discussed, the deductions must also be greater than 2% of a taxpayer’s AGI before any deduction can be claimed.

The limit on not-for-profit losses applies to individuals, partnerships, estates, trusts, and S corporations. It does not apply to corporations other than S corporations.

Conclusion

Hobbies do not receive favorable tax treatment by the IRS, so it is important to determine if an activity will be deemed a business or a hobby for income tax purposes. To be a business, the activity must be carried on with the intent of making a profit. An activity that is not a business will have limits on the amount of deductions it can take, and any losses from the activity cannot be used to offset other types of income. 

Apple to appleInternal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchanges have been very popular with taxpayers for many years. This Code section allows taxpayers to defer recognition of gain on the disposition of assets by participating in a like-kind exchange (“LKE”) transaction. There are several rules that a transaction must meet in order to qualify as an LKE. This article covers the basic requirements that must be met in order to defer recognition of gain on disposal of assets until a later date. 

 

The Basics of Section 1031 Exchanges

The first hurdle for an exchange of property to qualify as an LKE is that it must involve qualifying property. Qualifying property includes property used in a trade or business and property held for investment. Property used for personal purposes, stocks, bonds, notes, inventories , and partnership interests do not qualify for a Section 1031 exchange.

In addition to the requirement that the transaction must involve qualifying property, it must also involve like-kind property. Like-kind properties are of the same nature or character, even if they differ in grade or quality. Exchanging real property for real property would qualify as an exchange of like-kind properties; however, exchanging real property for tangible personal property would not qualify as an exchange of like-kind properties. Depreciable tangible personal property needs to be either like-kind or like-class to qualify for LKE treatment. To be considered like-class properties, the assets must be within the same General Asset Class or Product Class.

The basis of the property received in an LKE transaction is generally the same as the adjusted basis of the property given up, however, see the discussion below for partially nontaxable transactions.

 

Deferred Exchanges

A deferred exchange involves an exchange of like-kind assets that is completed over a period of time. Deferred exchanges are more complex, and additional requirements apply. There are time limits to meet in order for a deferred exchange to qualify as a Section 1031 exchange. The first time limit provides a taxpayer 45 days from the date the relinquished property is sold to identify potential replacement properties. The identification must be in writing, signed by the seller, and delivered to a person involved in the exchange (for example, the seller of the replacement property or a qualified intermediary). The second time limit requires that the replacement property must be received and the exchange completed no later than 180 days after the sale of the relinquished property or the due date (with extensions) of the income tax return for the year in which the relinquished property was sold, whichever is earlier. It is important to note that the replacement property will not be treated as like-kind property unless these identification and the receipt requirements are met.

Additionally, if the transferor actually or constructively receives money or unlike property in full consideration for the property transferred prior to the receipt of replacement property, the transaction is treated as a sale rather than a deferred exchange. Using a qualified intermediary (“QI”) can serve as a safe harbor against actual or constructive receipt.

A qualified intermediary is a party who enters into a written exchange agreement with the taxpayer. The written exchange agreement requires that the QI:

1. Acquires the relinquished property from the taxpayer,

2. Transfers the relinquished property,

3. Acquires the replacement property, and

4. Transfers the replacement property to the taxpayer.

The written exchange agreement must expressly limit the taxpayer’s rights to receive, pledge, borrow, or otherwise obtain the benefits of money or unlike property held by the QI before the end of the exchange period.

 

Beware: Some Exchanges are Only Partially Nontaxable

If money or unlike property, referred to as boot, is received in addition to the like-kind property and a gain is realized on the transaction, the exchange will be considered only partially nontaxable. Gain must be recognized equal to the lesser of the boot received or realized gain. If a loss is realized on the transaction, no loss can be recognized.

In calculating the realized gain, any liabilities assumed by the other party must be added to the amount realized. Any liabilities of the other party assumed by the taxpayer should be subtracted from the amount realized.

Example: A taxpayer exchanges business property with an adjusted basis of $32,000 for like-kind property. The property was subject to a $4,000 mortgage. The fair market value (“FMV”) of like-kind property received was $36,000. In addition, the taxpayer received $1,500 in cash and paid $500 in exchange expenses. The other party agreed to pay off the mortgage. How much gain should be recognized on the transaction?

LKE Chart 1

LKE Chart 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

The recognized gain on the transaction is $5,000.

 

The basis of the property that a taxpayer receives (other than money) in a partially nontaxable exchange is the total adjusted basis of the property given up, with some adjustments. Add to the basis any additional costs incurred and any gain recognized on the exchange. Subtract from the basis any money received and any loss recognized on the exchange. The basis is allocated first to the unlike property, other than money, up to its FMV on the date of the exchange. The remainder is the basis of the like-kind property.

 

LKE Transactions Involving Related Parties

There are special rules for LKE transactions between related persons. Under the rules, if either party disposes of the property within two years after the exchange, the exchange is disqualified from LKE treatment. In that event, the gain or loss on the original exchange must be recognized as of the date of the later disposition.

Related persons include members of the taxpayer’s family, a corporation owned greater than 50% by the taxpayer, and a partnership owned greater than 50% by the taxpayer. The two-year holding period begins on the date of last transfer of property that was part of the LKE transaction.

 

Conclusion

As discussed in this article, it is difficult to comply with the rules of Section 1031 related to a like-kind exchange transaction. Although there are many restrictions in place to meet the requirements of a like-kind exchange transaction, the benefits of deferring gain on an exchange can be great for taxpayers. For that reason, these transactions have been very popular for a number of years.

 

The Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) includes provisions that place restrictions on medical reimbursement plans and Health Reimbursement Arrangements (“HRAs”). These provisions are effective for plan years beginning after 2013. These rules apply to ALL employers, large and small. The following is a discussion of medical reimbursement plans and how the market reform provisions will affect employers offering these plans. 
 

Medical Reimbursement Plan and HRA Basics

 
By definition, medical reimbursement plans and HRAs are funded entirely but the employer and typically reimburse employees for out-of-pocket medical expenses and individual health insurance premiums. HRAs are a type of medical reimbursement plan with a feature that allows employees to carryover unused funds that were authorized, but not fully used, to the next tax year. Employees are reimbursed tax-free for qualified medical expenses up to a maximum dollar amount for each coverage period. The employer is also allowed to deduct the cost of the plan for tax purposes. The plan defines the types of health care costs for which the employee will receive reimbursement.  
 

New ACA Rules

 
Effective January 1, 2014 the market reform rules imposed by the ACA, eliminate the ability for some employers to use medical reimbursement plans and/or HRAs. Under these rules, health plans cannot impose annual dollar limits on certain health benefits, and they also must provide preventive health services at no cost to the employee. Unfortunately, most stand-alone medical reimbursement plans and HRAs do not meet these requirements.
 
In order to meet the market reform provisions of the ACA, the HRA plan must be integrated with primary health insurance coverage offered by an employer. There are rules here as well. In order for the HRA plan to be integrated with primary health insurance coverage, the HRA must only be available to employees who are covered by primary group health coverage that is provided by the employer and that meets the annual dollar limit prohibition.  
 
In addition, employer pretax reimbursement of non-employer sponsored health insurance premiums fails to meet the requirements of the market reform provisions. This also includes employer payment of premiums for non-employer sponsored health insurance directly to the insurance company. These are known as employer payment plans. The reasoning behind employer payment plans failing to meet the market reform provisions is that the ACA disallows a limitation on medical benefits provided under a group health plan, and an employer payment plan limits benefits to the amount of the premium reimbursed or paid. In order to comply with the market reform provisions, the employer may either provide an employer-sponsored qualified plan or replace a premium reimbursement arrangement with a taxable increase in wages that can be used by the employee to pay their own health insurance premiums. 
 

Penalties

 
The penalty for noncompliance with the market reform provisions of the ACA is severe. For violating these rules, an employer is subject to a penalty of $100 per day, per employee, or $36,500 per participant per year. It is imperative for employers to carefully consider whether their medical reimbursement plan or HRA violates the market reform provisions, causing the business to be subject to this penalty. 
 

More than 2% S Corporation Shareholder/Employees

 
It’s important to briefly discuss how these rules will affect a more than 2% shareholder/employee of an S Corporation. The basic rules are still the same from previous years. Employers can still reimburse or pay a more than 2% shareholder’s premiums, include the premium reimbursement in the shareholder’s W-2 (subject to income tax, not FICA), and deduct the additional compensation amount. Additionally, the shareholder can still deduct the premium reimbursement as an above-the-line, “for AGI” deduction even after 2013. Here’s where the market reform provisions of the ACA come into play. If the premiums that the S Corporation is paying or reimbursing are on non-employer sponsored health insurance for more than one S Corporation employee, then the reimbursement arrangement would be considered a group plan subject to the ACA provisions. Therefore, the penalty discussed above could apply, unless the premium reimbursement is included in the W-2 wages and taxable for BOTH income tax and FICA. 
 

Exceptions for Some Plans

 
There are some limited exceptions under which stand-alone medical reimbursement plans and HRAs may continue without violating the market reform provisions of the ACA. 

Conclusion

 
As a result of the market reform provisions of the ACA, employers are restricted from subsidizing or reimbursing employees for individual health insurance premiums on a pretax basis. Employers can however, provide a tax-free benefit to employees through an ACA-approved group health plan. They may also treat reimbursement of premiums for individual health insurance as compensation taxable for both income tax and FICA purposes. The penalties for noncompliance are harsh, so it’s important to understand how the ACA provisions will affect the plans that you currently have in place. Please give us a call at (719) 630-1186 if you need some assistance or have questions regarding this very complex topic.
As we move into 2015, the tax implications of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are becoming a reality for most individuals. The purpose of this article is a discussion of the changes that will affect individual tax filers due to the Individual Shared Responsibility provisions attached to the ACA. The focus will be on the basic requirements of the provisions and new tax rules for the 2014 tax year and beyond. 
 

The Individual Shared Responsibility Provisions

Beginning in January 2014, nonexempt individuals were required to maintain minimum essential coverage health insurance for themselves and their dependents for each month during the taxable year. In order to meet this requirement, an individual must be enrolled in and entitled to receive benefits that include minimum essential coverage for at least one day in the month. 
 
 Individuals have several options for obtaining health insurance meeting the minimum essential coverage requirements including:
 
 

Minimum Essential Coverage

 
In order to qualify as minimum essential coverage, a plan must include items and services within at least these categories:

Health Insurance Premium Assistance Refundable Credit

To help subsidize the cost of health insurance, a premium assistance credit is available. This is a refundable tax credit available to an “applicable taxpayer” for any month that one or more members of the taxpayer’s family are enrolled in qualified health insurance through a state exchange, AND not eligible for coverage through another source such as employer or government coverage. 
 
The credit can be determined in advance by making a request to an Exchange. In that case, Treasury can make direct payments of the credits to health plan insurers. However, individuals may elect to purchase insurance without taking the credits at time of purchase and then apply to the IRS for the credit at the end of the tax year. 
 

Exemptions from Requirement for Health Coverage

Some individuals may be exempt from the requirement to maintain minimum health coverage. These include:
For further explanation of the exemptions, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/uac/ACA-Individual-Shared-Responsibility-Provision-Exemptions
 

Payments Required for Noncompliance with the Individual Shared Responsibility Provisions

For 2014, the annual payment amount is the GREATER of 1% of household income that is above the tax return filing threshold for the taxpayer’s filing status, OR a family’s flat dollar amount. The flat dollar amount is $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, limited to a family maximum of $285 for 2014. The shared responsibility payments are phased in. For 2015, the payment is the greater of 2% of household income, or $325 per adult. For 2016, the payment is the greater of 2.5% of household income, or $695 per adult. 
 
For purposes of the individual shared responsibility payment, household income is defined as the sum of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), plus the aggregate MAGI of all other individuals taken into account in determining the taxpayer’s family size. 
 
Example:  In 2014, the Smiths, a couple with no children, file a return as married filing jointly. They have household income of $150,000. The Smiths are both uninsured for the entire year of 2014. What is the Smiths’ shared responsibility payment?
 
The penalty is the greater of the flat dollar penalty or the percentage of income penalty, so in this case it would be $1,297
 

New Tax Forms and Reporting Required for Individual Shared Responsibility Provisions

Individuals will need to complete some new tax forms to include with their 2014 return. IRS Form 8962 will be used to compute Premium Tax Credits for individuals. This form should be filed by you if you are an individual taking the premium tax credit, or if advance payment of the premium tax credit was paid for you or anyone in your tax family. In addition, Form 8965 will be filed by you if you want to claim a coverage exemption for yourself or another member of your tax household. Form 1040 will also require new entries on line 46, Excess Advance Premium Tax Credit Repayment, line 61, Tax Owed for Individual Shared Responsibility Payment, and line 69, Net Premium Tax Credit
 
For Draft 2014 Form 1040, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1040–dft.pdf
 
For 2014 Form 8962, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8962.pdf
 
For 2014 Form 8965, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8965.pdf
 

Conclusion

Individual taxpayers filing 2014 tax returns in the year 2015 will be affected by the ACA Individual Shared Responsibility provisions. If you do not meet the requirements of the Individual Shared Responsibility provisions, you will be required to make a payment for noncompliance. Keep in mind that the payment amounts will increase for tax years 2015 and after, so it would be in the best interest of most individuals to comply with these provisions to avoid penalties in future tax years. 
 
We are always happy to discuss your individual tax situation with you and help you better understand these new provisions. You may contact us at (719) 630-1186 or through our Secure Email.
 
 

Many businesses will be affected by the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Beginning in January 2015, applicable large employers will be subject to these provisions and need to be in compliance to avoid making payments to the IRS. This article will discuss the changes that will come about for businesses due to the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions attached to the ACA including new tax rules for the 2015 tax year and beyond.

 

The Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions

Beginning in January 2015, employers with 100 or more full-time and full-time equivalent (FTE) employees in 2015 (reducing to 50 or more for 2016 and thereafter) may be assessed fees for any month they fail to offer employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage. They may also be assessed fees if they do offer employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage, but the employee contribution amount for this coverage is deemed unaffordable. Small employers and self-insured companies do not have to comply with the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions. 
 
For purposes of the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions, a full-time employee is an individual employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week. An employer that meets the 50 full-time employee threshold (100 in the year 2015) is referred to as an applicable large employer. 
 
The Employer Shared Responsibility provisions generally are not effective until Jan. 1, 2015, meaning that no Employer Shared Responsibility payments will be assessed for 2014. Employers will use information about the number of employees they employ and their hours of service during 2014 to determine whether they employ enough employees to be an applicable large employer for 2015.
 

Are You an Applicable Large Employer?

To be subject to the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions for a calendar year, an employer must have employed during the previous calendar year at least 50 full-time employees or a combination of full-time and part-time employees that equals at least 50 (100 for tax year 2015). An employee working 130 hours in a calendar month will be treated as the monthly equivalent of 30 hours per week.
 
Part-time employees need to be converted to full-time equivalent employees by calculating the aggregate number of hours (but not more than 120 hours for any one-employee) for all employees who were not employed on average at least 30 hours per week for that month. Next, divide the total hours calculated by 120. This equals the number of full-time equivalent employees for the calendar month. Seasonal employees are not included in the calculation of FTE employees. 
 
Example:  Jones, Inc. has 92 full-time employees, plus 10 part-time employees for the month. The total number of hours worked for the month by part-time workers is 1,100. Calculate the number of full-time employees. 
 

 

Full-time

92

 

 

92

Part-time

10

1,100

120

9.2

Total

102

 

 

101

 
In this example, Jones, Inc. qualifies as an applicable large employer in 2015 because it has 101 full-time equivalent employees for the month. 
 
Companies with a common owner or part of a controlled group need to combine their employees to determine if the companies, collectively, constitute an applicable large employer. If the combined total meets the threshold, then each separate company is subject to the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions. 
 

Requirements for Employer to Comply with ACA Provisions

Applicable large employers must offer minimum essential health coverage to 70% of full-time employees and their dependents to be compliant. The percentage increases to 95% in 2016 and thereafter. In addition, the health coverage offered by the employer must be affordable for the employee. For this requirement, an employee’s contribution for single coverage cannot exceed 9.5% of the employee’s annual household income. The plan is also required to provide minimum value coverage to employees and their dependents. A plan provides minimum value if it covers at least 60% of the total allowed cost of benefits that are expected to be incurred under the plan. 
 

Play or Pay – What is the Cost of Noncompliance?

Applicable large employers that are not in compliance with the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions may be subject to two new penalties beginning in 2015. A large employer may be liable for one, but not both, of these penalties. An applicable large employer may be assessed fees for each month they:
 
  1. Fail to offer employer-sponsored minimum essential coverage to 70% of full-time employees and their dependents (increasing to 95% in 2016), AND at least one full-time employee enrolls for coverage, from the Exchange, and receives a subsidy. The assessment is equal to 1/12 of $2,000, or $166.67 per month, for each full-time employee, less the first 80 employees in 2015 (decreasing to 30 in 2016 and thereafter).
  2. Offer employer-sponsored minimum value coverage to full-time employees and their dependents, but the employee contribution is deemed unaffordable, AND at least one employee enrolls for coverage, from the Exchange, and receives a subsidy. The assessment is the LESSER of:
 
Example:  For every month in 2015, ABC Corp. fails to offer minimum essential coverage to its 125 full-time employees. One of ABC’s employees receives a tax credit for enrolling in a plan offered on the Colorado Exchange. For 2015, ABC Corp. will be assessed a non-deductible excise tax of $90,000. (125 full-time employees – 80 for 2015 = 45 * $2,000 = $90,000)
 

New Tax Forms and Reporting Required for Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions

Applicable large employers that provide health insurance coverage through an employer-sponsored plan, whether through an insurance provider or self-insured plan, must provide coverage information statements to covered employees on Form 1095-C. A copy of form 1095-C will also be submitted by these employers to the IRS with transmittal Form 1094-C. Health insurers, including sponsors of self-insured plans, will provide required information to covered employees on Form 1095-B. A copy of this form will also be submitted by these health insurers to the IRS with transmittal Form 1094-B. 
 
For further explanation of these new forms, please follow this link:
https://www.skrco.com/blogs/news-and-tax-alerts/2014/8/27/new-aca-reporting-forms-you-need-to-know-about
 
For Draft 2014 Form 1095-C, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1095c–dft.pdf
 
For Draft 2014 Form 1095-B, please follow this link:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1095b–dft.pdf
 

Conclusion

As an employer, if you have not done so already, now is the time to determine whether you will be considered an applicable large employer. If you will be an applicable large employer, and you decide to provide an employer-sponsored health plan, you need to determine if the plan will be in compliance with the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions to avoid having to pay the excise tax. If you will be an applicable large employer and choose not to provide an employer-sponsored health plan, you should determine how much you will be required to pay and plan accordingly. If you have questions regarding this complicated subject matter, please contact us at (719) 630-1186.